The french weatherman Philippe Verdier speaks truth and gets punished for it..typical.
The so called inconvenient truth is not the global warming as suggested by Al Gore, but the fact we are fooled on a daily basis under the guise of science. Furthermore global warming can't exist by definition because it presupposes we live on a globe.
See also my post of 3 October.
Top US scientist Hal Lewis resigned from his post at the University of California after admitting that global warming was a big scam, in a shocking resignation letter.
From the Telegraph
The following is a letter to the American Physical Society released to the public by Professor Emeritus of physics Hal Lewis of the University of California at Santa Barbara
Sent: Friday, 08 October 2010 17:19 Hal Lewis
From: Hal Lewis, University of California, Santa Barbara
To: Curtis G. Callan, Jr., Princeton University, President of the American Physical Society
6 October 2010
When I first joined the American Physical Society sixty-seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood (a threat against which Dwight Eisenhower warned a half-century ago).
Indeed, the choice of physics as a profession was then a guarantor of a life of poverty and abstinence – it was World War II that changed all that. The prospect of worldly gain drove few physicists. As recently as thirty-five years ago, when I chaired the first APS study of a contentious social/scientific issue, The Reactor Safety Study, though there were zealots aplenty on the outside there was no hint of inordinate pressure on us as physicists. We were therefore able to produce what I believe was and is an honest appraisal of the situation at that time. We were further enabled by the presence of an oversight committee consisting of Pief Panofsky, Vicki Weisskopf, and Hans Bethe, all towering physicists beyond reproach. I was proud of what we did in a charged atmosphere. In the end the oversight committee, in its report to the APS President, noted the complete independence in which we did the job, and predicted that the report would be attacked from both sides. What greater tribute could there be?
How different it is now. The giants no longer walk the earth, and the money flood has become the raison d’être of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs. For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society.
It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.) I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.
So what has the APS, as an organization, done in the face of this challenge? It has accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it…
I do feel the need to add one note, and this is conjecture, since it is always risky to discuss other people’s motives. This scheming at APS HQ is so bizarre that there cannot be a simple explanation for it. Some have held that the physicists of today are not as smart as they used to be, but I don’t think that is an issue. I think it is the money, exactly what Eisenhower warned about a half-century ago. There are indeed trillions of dollars involved, to say nothing of the fame and glory (and frequent trips to exotic islands) that go with being a member of the club.
Of course that so called moon rock is fake; I could have told you that but most likely you would not have believed me. If you question the information that NASA puts out you'll surely find out that it's all BS. Wake up people unless you are comfortable living a lie.
Look at number 2 in the picture of a pre-2001 encyclopedia and wonder which type of power can PULVERIZE 500,000 t, mostly STEEL, plus two planes within 12 seconds?
Notice the MOLTEN ROCK at the base of the former Twin Towers in the picture below and ask yourself again what type of power can do that. Remember that it took till 19 December of 2001 to extinguish the fires. The kerosene of the planes you think? Nano-thermite? You think?!
The steel that 'survived' the collapse was quickly shipped away to foreign countries instead of being held for further investigation or recycling. Better not to hold on to contaminated goods.
Radioactive Steel Contamination
On the 26th February the Indian newspaper "The Hindu" reported that Indian steel
products exported to Europe and the USA were contaminated with Cobalt 60.
Some 123 shipments of contaminated steel have been denied entry into the USA since
screening started in 2003, 67 from India, 23 from China and 20 from Canada.
In Germany, 150 tonnes of contaminated stainless steel from India bound for Russia has
been impounded or sent back, much of it in 2008. The article reports that most of the
stainless steel exported by India is first imported as scrap and recycled.
The article begs the question - why was a US screening program set up in 2003 to monitor
imported steel for radioactive contamination. And what are the sources of this radioactive
contamination and how is it getting into commercial steel in such quantities as to be
measurable when diluted by thousands of tonnes of steel?
It will be remembered that the structural steel from the WTC was removed and shipped
quickly overseas for recycling without independent forensic analysis.
Even the special effects of the first Star Wars movie from the late 70s are more convincing than the ones used for the recently released NASA footage of both the dark side of the moon and planet earth.