Why do all so called experts claim that around 2045, give or take 5 years, mankind will somehow turn into a different kind of species. I have mentioned this before: http://dotsmathcoffee.com/?p=2473
Would you accept such a fate?
Ushering in Planet X by re-branding it Planet 9. Notice how the pictures provided in both articles are nothing more than artistic renderings which is typical for space agency 'photos'. On top of that are the titles of articles linked below a clue that it is not certain at all that this Planet 9 would be real.
The first title is: 'Ninth Planet' MAY exist in solar system: US scientists. May?! Define may:
1.expressing possibility."that may be true"
How about DOES exist if it is so certain.
The second title is Scientists: GOOD evidence for 9th planet in solar system. Define good:
1.to be desired or approved of."it's good that he's back to his old self"
Does the alleged existence of Planet 9 has your approval? In 'science' one would expect a term like irrefutable or absolute, don't you think?
Not surprisingly but also sadly it takes a Nobel prize winning MIT professor named Robert Solow, or a previously mentioned Thomas Piketty, to warn you for the obvious future in which the very very few will rule the many. It of course was never any different (I mean: ever wondered who owns all the printed money and landmass?) but lately it is becoming abundantly blatant.
Why do you think the media addressed the recent Powerball lottery with a jackpot of more than a billion? I have my doubts that amount will in fact be paid to someone but besides that it is the term billionaire that sticks. Every amount less doesn't count these days.
Yet there is more than enough money to end poverty overnight when redistributed differently and with the mindset that poverty is a disgrace to mankind.
America as promoted is the land of the free and home of the brave but soon the whole earth becomes the world of the fee and home of the slave..and as always: simply reflecting our collective mindset.
I have noticed over the previous year that 2045 is connected to 'living forever' and defeating/cheating death. Below two examples and I will keep looking for more similar articles. I wonder about the reason for mentioning THAT year in particular.
Use your deductive skills to discern what's real and what's fake concerning 'Climate Change'. Take for example today's contradictory headers on Drudgereport:
Obama Ignores 'Wrap-It-Up' Beeps During Speech...
Slow 'Climate Change' With Fake Volcano!
Skeptical Documentary Set to Rock UN Summit...
Conference will produce '300,000 TONS of C02'...
China to launch carbon-tracking satellites into space...
Hollande slams 'scandalous' protests...
POPE: World headed toward 'suicide' if no deal...
George Soros, Tom Steyer 'investors' in Obama energy plan...
FLASHBACK: Temp data fiddling 'biggest science scandal ever'...
Yeah, yeah, yeah..and the moon attracts oceans (but not lakes) but at same 'time' the earth can't attract the moon, how does that even make any sense?
If you agree to the terms and conditions of so called scientists you are bound by the laws that science presupposes. Mind you that in the definition of presupposition there is 'uncertainty' for it is a belief of some sort. Study basic contract law to grasp how your thoughts/speech relates to matter; how agreement is analogues to signing a contract.