One of the worst thing that could happen in aviation is a hijacking situation but worry not, for since decades a hijacking recovery system by the name of "Home Run" has been operational.
Read the words of Andreas Bülow on this particular subject below as published in the german newspaper "Tagesspiegel" on January 13th of 2002. Mister Bülow served as secretary of state in the German Federal Ministry of Defence (1976-1980) and Minister for Research and Technology (1980-1982) :
"There is also the theory of one British flight engineer: according to this, the steering of the planes was perhaps taken out of the pilots' hands, from outside. The Americans had developed a method in the 1970s, whereby they could rescue hijacked planes by intervening into the computer piloting [automatic pilot system]. This theory says, this technique was abused in this case..."
Not quite so much a theory as might first appear. When I released the above report about "Home Run" remote control in October 2001, I mentioned that one European flag carrier was aware of the technology, though at that precise point in time I thought it prudent not to name the actual airline:
"As long ago as the early nineties, a major European flag carrier acquired the information and was seriously alarmed that one of its own aircraft might be "rescued" by the Americans without its authority. Accordingly, this flag carrier completely stripped the American flight control computers out of its entire fleet, and replaced them with a home grown version. These aircraft are now effectively impregnable to penetration by Home Run, but that is more than can be said for the American aircraft fleet..."
The European flag carrier which completely stripped the American flight computers out of its aircraft was Lufthansa, the German national airline. Bearing in mind his former posts as Secretary of Defence and Minister of Science and Technology, Herr Bülow would have known all about this mammoth but secretive task."
Apparently the hijacking recovery system has been improved and multiple US patents were secured by Boeing since 2003:
The system was integrally installed on Boeing air crafts from 2007 onward known as Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptable Autopilot or BUAP.
Even CNN has reported on it for YOU to KNOW what's going on the next time you board an airplane. Do you take a hint?
This also means that all the new protocols since the German Wings incident with the 'suicidal' pilot are obsolete and solely meant for you to be distracted, fearful and in hope for a 'solution' which once revealed will become a new 'problem'. I mean, once critical mass has come to know about BUAP and how long it already has been in operation the chapter 'the bad guys can now cyber hijack commercial airplanes' will commence.....wait for it.
Remember Charlie Hebdo?..a little over a year ago 'terrorists' attacked free speech. As of today politicians do the same thing minus the murder, ..for now that is.
In case you are still wondering (as opposed to SEEING) where 'the world' is going I suggest you read up on George Orwell's 1984, a good place to start. Wake up but do it quickly for time is not on your hand and while you're at it, mentally prepare to kiss your beloved 'Western values' goodbye and enjoy them while you still can.
JE SUIS Charlie
ICH BIN Jan
AM, or better, WAS Chancellor Of The Free World 2015:
Let's remind ourselves of this truthful thought of Benjamin Franklin:
"Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."
In case you believe that your mobile phone Apple or Android can't be hacked by the 'authorities' then you are hopelessly naive. Ever heard of a backdoor?
Via the media you are told that your privacy is taken away from you and of course you won't protest because you probably think it is safer that way. Now 'authority' Snowden confirms that it IS possible for governmental agencies to hack which is nothing more than rubbing it in.
Why do all so called experts claim that around 2045, give or take 5 years, mankind will somehow turn into a different kind of species. I have mentioned this before: http://dotsmathcoffee.com/?p=2473
Would you accept such a fate?
Ushering in Planet X by re-branding it Planet 9. Notice how the pictures provided in both articles are nothing more than artistic renderings which is typical for space agency 'photos'. On top of that are the titles of articles linked below a clue that it is not certain at all that this Planet 9 would be real.
The first title is: 'Ninth Planet' MAY exist in solar system: US scientists. May?! Define may:
modal verb: may
1.expressing possibility."that may be true"
How about DOES exist if it is so certain.
The second title is Scientists: GOOD evidence for 9th planet in solar system. Define good:
adjective: good; comparative adjective: better; superlative adjective: best
1.to be desired or approved of."it's good that he's back to his old self"
Does the alleged existence of Planet 9 has your approval? In 'science' one would expect a term like irrefutable or absolute, don't you think?