Piloted Commercial Airliners Are Nothing But Drones

One of the worst thing that could happen in aviation is a hijacking situation but worry not, for since decades a hijacking recovery system by the name of "Home Run" has been operational.
Read the words of Andreas Bülow on this particular subject below as published in the german newspaper "Tagesspiegel" on January 13th of 2002.  Mister Bülow served as secretary of state in the German Federal Ministry of Defence (1976-1980) and Minister for Research and Technology (1980-1982) :

"There is also the theory of one British flight engineer: according to this, the steering of the planes was perhaps taken out of the pilots' hands, from outside. The Americans had developed a method in the 1970s, whereby they could rescue hijacked planes by intervening into the computer piloting [automatic pilot system]. This theory says, this technique was abused in this case..."
Not quite so much a theory as might first appear. When I released the above report about "Home Run" remote control in October 2001, I mentioned that one European flag carrier was aware of the technology, though at that precise point in time I thought it prudent not to name the actual airline:
"As long ago as the early nineties, a major European flag carrier acquired the information and was seriously alarmed that one of its own aircraft might be "rescued" by the Americans without its authority. Accordingly, this flag carrier completely stripped the American flight control computers out of its entire fleet, and replaced them with a home grown version. These aircraft are now effectively impregnable to penetration by Home Run, but that is more than can be said for the American aircraft fleet..."

The European flag carrier which completely stripped the American flight computers out of its aircraft was Lufthansa, the German national airline. Bearing in mind his former posts as Secretary of Defence and Minister of Science and Technology, Herr Bülow would have known all about this mammoth but secretive task."
Apparently the hijacking recovery system has been improved and multiple US patents were secured by Boeing since 2003:
The system was integrally installed on Boeing air crafts from 2007 onward known as Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptable Autopilot or BUAP.
Even CNN has reported on it for YOU to KNOW what's going on the next time you board an airplane. Do you take a hint?
This also means that all the new protocols since the German Wings incident with the 'suicidal' pilot are obsolete and solely meant for you to be distracted, fearful and in hope for a 'solution' which once revealed will become a new 'problem'. I mean, once critical mass has come to know about BUAP and how long it already has been in operation the chapter 'the bad guys can now cyber hijack commercial airplanes' will commence.....wait for it.

United Evil

Which company produced the Zyklon B for the gas showers in Nazi Germany? IG Farben aka Bayer.
Which company produced Agent Orange for the Vietnam war? You guessed right, MONSANTO.
Now Bayer may buy Monsanto and the world may enjoy their consolidated power.
For lack of knowledge people are destroyed.

Dog And Pony Show

In case you believe that your mobile phone Apple or Android can't be hacked by the 'authorities' then you are hopelessly naive. Ever heard of a backdoor?
Via the media you are told that your privacy is taken away from you and of course you won't protest because you probably think it is safer that way. Now 'authority' Snowden confirms that it IS possible for governmental agencies to hack which is nothing more than rubbing it in.

There's Something About 2045 So Save The Date

I have noticed over the previous year that 2045 is connected to 'living forever' and defeating/cheating death. Below two examples and I will keep looking for more similar articles. I wonder about the reason for mentioning THAT year in particular.

Ignorance Is Bliss....And Cancerous

The article features the following paragraph:
"Radiation released by nuclear bombs is obviously harmful. Known as ionizing radiation, it is powerful enough to remove electrons from atoms. By contrast, radio-frequency energy is a form of non-ionizing radiation given off by cellular and portable phones, Wi-Fi routers, baby monitors and countless other devices."
So now I am suppose to believe that all non-ionizing radiation is harmless. Poor thinking. How about ultraviolet, infrared or microwaves? The latter, by the way, is emitted and received by your mobile phone and widely used to heat up food. Go sit in the Australian summer sun without protection and report back to me how THAT works for you. Or a well known classic: put your pet in a microwave oven and observe how the non-ionizing radiation 'transforms' him.
Just do some research how the level microwaves from your mobile gets approved, you'll be stunned and realize something fishy is going on and don't forget to look into the work of Barry Trower, you can find him on Youtube.
I mean: Why do you think that 4G network is forbidden in Bruxelles, the EU capital? Why do you think the Scientific Council in The Netherlands sued the Health Council regarding mobile device radiation levels? Why do you think a UMTS antenna mechanic is only allowed to work less than 5 hours in proximity of such an antenna? Why do you think dutch Prof. Michiel Haas wrote a book called 'Electrostress & Health'? Why did Italy's Supreme Court rule that there is a causal link between mobile phone use and cancer? Why are there multiple publications which conclude that living closer than 450 meters from a UMTS antenna increases the chance of cancer with a factor 3.5? etc etc.
Remember that BEFORE 1920 it was known that asbestos is a carcinogen but it took well over 70 years before it was forbidden by law to use that material for construction in The Netherlands, not sure about other countries on earth, but the denial and/or deliberate cover-up about the hazards of that material has certainly caused a lot of unnecessary suffering.
One more excerpt from the above NY Times article: “Scientific opinion is split on the issue — many different studies have reached different conclusions based on the same evidence,”
Ask yourself how an opinion is even scientific. Define opinion:
noun: opinion; plural noun: opinions
  1. 1.
    a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.
Get it? Scientific opinion is a contradictio in terminis for true science is factual and based on knowledge.
Anyway, I am not afraid of a phone call or WiFi here and there but I do promote awareness about the instruments we use on a daily basis and the possible risks thereof. The latter are of course obfuscated by the parties who want to make a buck out of greed and that bothers me more than sitting in a WiFi area for a while. What bothers me even more is the guileless, docile and even indulgent attitude of the masses/consumers towards the sellers and 'authorities'; their lack of awareness and care, not to mention knowledge.

Classic Trap

Don't fall for it, I mean religiously believing that technology is the answer to our own created problems in spite of it sounding sensible and attractive. The so called progression via technology is an illusory one and it will lead to transhumanism.
The world lacks love and care,...NOT 'better' technology.

Back to Top