connect the DOTS, do the MATH and smell the COFFEE

One of the worst thing that could happen in aviation is a hijacking situation but worry not, for since decades a hijacking recovery system by the name of "Home Run" has been operational.

Read the words of Andreas Bülow on this particular subject below as published in the german newspaper "Tagesspiegel" on January 13th of 2002.  Mister Bülow served as secretary of state in the German Federal Ministry of Defence (1976-1980) and Minister for Research and Technology (1980-1982) :

"There is also the theory of one British flight engineer: according to this, the steering of the planes was perhaps taken out of the pilots' hands, from outside. The Americans had developed a method in the 1970s, whereby they could rescue hijacked planes by intervening into the computer piloting [automatic pilot system]. This theory says, this technique was abused in this case..."

Not quite so much a theory as might first appear. When I released the above report about "Home Run" remote control in October 2001, I mentioned that one European flag carrier was aware of the technology, though at that precise point in time I thought it prudent not to name the actual airline:

"As long ago as the early nineties, a major European flag carrier acquired the information and was seriously alarmed that one of its own aircraft might be "rescued" by the Americans without its authority. Accordingly, this flag carrier completely stripped the American flight control computers out of its entire fleet, and replaced them with a home grown version. These aircraft are now effectively impregnable to penetration by Home Run, but that is more than can be said for the American aircraft fleet..."

The European flag carrier which completely stripped the American flight computers out of its aircraft was Lufthansa, the German national airline. Bearing in mind his former posts as Secretary of Defence and Minister of Science and Technology, Herr Bülow would have known all about this mammoth but secretive task."

Apparently the hijacking recovery system has been improved and multiple US patents were secured by Boeing since 2003:

• http://www.google.co.uk/patents/US7142971

• http://www.google.com/patents/US20090105891

• http://www.google.com/patents/US20030093187

The system was integrally installed on Boeing air crafts from 2007 onward known as Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptable Autopilot or BUAP.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Honeywell_Uninterruptible_Autopilot

Even CNN has reported on it for YOU to KNOW what's going on the next time you board an airplane. Do you take a hint?

http://edition.cnn.com/videos/world/2014/03/28/tsr-dnt-todd-remote-controlled-auto-pilot.cnn

This also means that all the new protocols since the German Wings incident with the 'suicidal' pilot are obsolete and solely meant for you to be distracted, fearful and in hope for a 'solution' which once revealed will become a new 'problem'. I mean, once critical mass has come to know about BUAP and how long it already has been in operation the chapter 'the bad guys can now cyber hijack commercial airplanes' will commence.....wait for it.

Just to remind ourselves: The US east coast blizzard prediction maps are NOT video footage!...for the simple reason there are most likely no weather satellites to record that in spite of we are TOLD and led to BELIEVE. The imagery that you see as weather forecast is a translation (from numbers to pixels) or modeling of data that comes from WITHIN our atmosphere. I am talking about thermometers, barometers, radar and weather balloons which combined supply sufficient data in order to produce a so called satellite view and thus render ASSUMED video footage from a real orbital 'weather' satellite obsolete.

NASA openly admits to this and it is easy to grasp once you know what to look for. Observe the recent Tweet by NASA and notice the used language in particular:

Our supercomputers @NASA_NCCS crunched the data to show the cloud flow of #Blizzard2016: https://t.co/W7NwdBQbbnhttps://t.co/qHL3pp7Vgk

— NASA (@NASA) January 22, 2016

The text right below the Tweet provided by NASA but not shown in picture above:

NASA's GEOS-5 provides a satellite view of historic winter stormThe near-real-time GEOS-5 ATMOSPHERIC DATA assimilation system ingests more than 5 million observations every 6 hours producing comprehensive analyses & forecasts of the atmosphere each day.

Get it?

First and foremost: the GEOS-5 assimilates ATMOSPHERIC DATA and so NASA tells you that what they show you comes from WITHIN our atmosphere..NOT from some supposed satellite!!!

Furthermore: Global MODELING and assimilation office; Supercomputations by NASA's supercomputers had to be made in order to PROVIDE an image because it wasn't an image from the start like in the case of an actual photo or video. It's a composite, a model, an illustration, an assimilation of data indeed....so why need a satellite then?..Go figure!

NASA's GEOS-5 provides a 'satellite view', as in: as if it were filmed by a satellite.

Learn to read between the lines, to dissect text like a lawyer, to read the fine print even when it isn't provided because words do have meaning.

Ushering in Planet X by re-branding it Planet 9. Notice how the pictures provided in both articles are nothing more than artistic renderings which is typical for space agency 'photos'. On top of that are the titles of articles linked below a clue that it is not certain at all that this Planet 9 would be real.

The first title is: 'Ninth Planet' MAY exist in solar system: US scientists. May?! Define may:

How about DOES exist if it is so certain.

The second title is Scientists: GOOD evidence for 9th planet in solar system. Define good:

Does the alleged existence of Planet 9 has your approval? In 'science' one would expect a term like irrefutable or absolute, don't you think?

http://news.yahoo.com/ninth-planet-may-exist-solar-system-us-scientists-174753045.html

http://news.yahoo.com/scientists-good-evidence-9th-planet-solar-system-171654347.html

This David Bowie tribute shot in space!? Watch closely and think again.

Your mind is being manipulated on a daily basis in the most sneaky ways with confusion as result which is a perfect way to divide people and cause war, which actually MEANS confusion in old German. How to circumvent the oceans of bullshit? Simply search for and only accept THE truth where confusion can't exist by definition for it is absolute and singular. OR you can be satisfied with worldly misery selling/telling yourself it is all relative, part of life, human nature, that it will always be like that, etc etc.

PS I am well aware that TEDx is astroturf too, therfore detest it,  and thus ironic I use a TEDx to explain how it is corrupt.

Use your deductive skills to discern what's real and what's fake concerning 'Climate Change'. Take for example today's contradictory headers on Drudgereport:

HOT AIR...
Obama Ignores 'Wrap-It-Up' Beeps During Speech...
Slow 'Climate Change' With Fake Volcano!
Skeptical Documentary Set to Rock UN Summit...
Conference will produce '300,000 TONS of C02'...
China to launch carbon-tracking satellites into space...
Hollande slams 'scandalous' protests...
POPE: World headed toward 'suicide' if no deal...
George Soros, Tom Steyer 'investors' in Obama energy plan...
FLASHBACK: Temp data fiddling 'biggest science scandal ever'...

http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/622515/Did-scientists-pick-first-intelligent-radio-waves-distant-alien-planet-Australia-telescope

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/scientists-capture-black-hole-eating-a-star-and-then-vomiting-it-back-out-a6751976.html

Yeah, yeah, yeah..and the moon attracts oceans (but not lakes) but at same 'time' the earth can't attract the moon, how does that even make any sense?

If you agree to the terms and conditions of so called scientists you are bound by the laws that science presupposes. Mind you that in the definition of presupposition there is 'uncertainty' for it is a belief of some sort. Study basic contract law to grasp how your thoughts/speech relates to matter; how agreement is analogues to signing a contract.