connect the DOTS, do the MATH and smell the COFFEE

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3423063/Is-technology-causing-evolve-new-SPECIES-Expert-believes-super-humans-called-Homo-optimus-talk-machines-digitally-immortal-2050.html

Why do all so called experts claim that around 2045, give or take 5 years, mankind will somehow turn into a different kind of species. I have mentioned this before: http://dotsmathcoffee.com/?p=2473

Would you accept such a fate?

I have noticed over the previous year that 2045 is connected to 'living forever' and defeating/cheating death. Below two examples and I will keep looking for more similar articles. I wonder about the reason for mentioning THAT year in particular.

http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/life/630902/company-bring-dead-back-to-life-with-brain-preserving

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/06/18/dmitry-itskov_n_3458305.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3380709/Superintellingence-AI-humans-working-solve-climate-change-end-wars-researchers-claim.html

Don't fall for it, I mean religiously believing that technology is the answer to our own created problems in spite of it sounding sensible and attractive. The so called progression via technology is an illusory one and it will lead to transhumanism.

The world lacks love and care,...NOT 'better' technology.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/classic-apps/techno-skeptics-objection-growing-louder/2015/12/26/e83cf658-617a-11e5-8e9e-dce8a2a2a679_story.html

Have you thought what would happen if we eventually merge with machines? Can you grasp what THAT would mean? Do you think such an alteration could benefit YOU or perhaps some body else? Does the fruit of the tree of knowledge taste any good you find?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/12042781/Google-D-Wave-quantum-computer-is-100-million-times-faster-than-your-PC.html

http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2015/10/hillary-clinton-robot-sweat

She, AI or not, is right; why would she even want to be human? As a master of law she knows that the term human means monster according to Black's Law Dictionary. So what?! Well, a monster can't own land nor inherit it. Hillary seems like someone who belongs to the club of landowners of this world but of course owning land is not enough. How about confiscation of your converted life energy as tax with your consent? Now that's fun.

In any case it is important to know the true definition of words, their terms and conditions. Accepting a meaning is signing a 'spiritual' contract if it were and thus you are bound by it.

http://www.cnet.com/news/google-exec-with-robots-in-our-brains-well-be-godlike/

http://www.popsci.com/hitachi-hires-artificial-intelligence-bosses-for-their-warehouses

..and the same goes for 'humans' which by the way originally means monster. You think a monster is qualified to subdue the earth? Or eligible for the inheritance thereof for that matter?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/study-finds-that-violent-video-games-may-be-linked-to-aggressive-behaviour-10458614.html

http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/08/mit-claims-to-have-found-a-language-universal-that-ties-all-languages-together/

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-08-10/google-to-adopt-new-holding-structure-under-name-alphabet-